Analysis of Local Beneficiaries’ Network for Watershed Co-Management in Aq Qala County

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Golbarg Bakhshesh 1
Mehdi Ghorbani 2
seyyed amirhossein garakani 3
Sajjad Amiri 4
sedighe ghafari 5
1 MSc Student, Department of Natural Resources Policy, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, CT.C. Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Research Assistant Professor, Rural Development Center, Natural Hazards Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
5 Researcher at the Social Business Institute, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Iran.
10.30470/jrdes.2026.2077832.1113
Abstract
Collaborative management is an effective approach in natural resource management, emphasizing the active involvement of all stakeholders in decision-making, particularly in watershed areas where diverse groups with varying interests coexist. Understanding social networks and the complex relationships among local stakeholders who directly utilize watershed resources is essential for achieving sustainable resource management. This study analyzed the social networks of local stakeholders in three villages—Enqelab, Gorg Tappeh, and Yalmeh Salian—located in Aqqala County. The study population consisted of members of rural development and prosperity centers, considered collaborative institutions based on mutual trust. Data were collected through a social network analysis (SNA) questionnaire, analyzed using UCINET software, and visualized with the NetDraw plugin. Macro, meso, and micro-level network indicators, including density, reciprocity, transitivity, centralization, average geodesic distance, core-periphery, and degree centrality, were employed to evaluate network structure, trust, and collaboration. Results indicated that Enqelab village exhibited relatively cohesive networks with balanced relationships, while Gorg Tappeh showed weaknesses in trust and collaboration ties, and Yalmeh Salian was highly dependent on a few key individuals. Core-periphery and degree centrality indicators revealed notable differences in the distribution of relationships and power among stakeholders. The findings suggest that collaborative programs should be designed according to each village's social structure, emphasizing the strengthening of social ties and support for key actors to enhance decision-making processes and social capital. This study provides guidance for planning collaborative initiatives based on social network structures in watershed management.
Keywords
Watershed Co-Management
Distribution of Power
Social Network Analysis
Social Capital
Aqqala County

اشتری، حسن؛ قربانی، مهدی؛ خراسانی، محمدامین؛ غفاری، صدیقه. (1403). تحلیل پویایی انسجام سازمانی در اجرای طرح آبادانی و پیشرفت روستایی (موردمطالعه: شهرستان گچساران). پژوهش های روستائی، 15(2). 397-382.

تارمحمدی قورچی، زهرا؛ عبداله زاده، غلامحسین؛ شریف‌زاده، محمد شریف؛ قزل، عبدالوهاب. (1399). بررسی امکان‌پذیری حکمروایی خوب در فرآیند مدیریت مشارکتی آب در شهرستان آق‌قلا. پژوهش آب در کشاورزی, 34(2)، 287-300.

سروی صدرآباد، حسین؛ اسلامی، ایمان. (1398). تحلیل شبکه و سرمایۀ اجتماعی درون گروهی در مدیریت مشارکتی منابع آب (مطالعۀ موردی: روستای صدرآباد، حوزۀ آبخیز ندوشن یزد). نشریه علمی - پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری، 72(3)، 753-739.

عسگری، حشمت اله؛  شرافت، سجاد. (1392). تحلیل عوامل موثر بر شکل گیری اعتماد اجتماعی در جوامع روستایی (مطالعه موردی: دهستان هجدان دشت، شهرستان مهران). پژوهش های روستائی، 4(4)، 879-851.

غفاری، صدیقه؛ قربانی، مهدی؛ سلاجقه، علی؛ نادری، احمد؛ غنیان، منصور؛ آزادی، حسین. (1403). تحلیل موقعیت کنشگران و تضادهای نهادی در حکمرانی آب خوزستان. مجله علمی سامانه‌های سطوح آبگیر باران ایران. 12(3). 116-97.

فیروزپور، مصطفی؛ عرفان‌زاده، رضا، قربانی، مهدی؛ راسخی، ساره. (1394). تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی و الگوی ساختاری روابط اجتماعی بهره‌برداران مرتع (مطالعه موردی: روستای تاکر – شهرستان نور). نشریه علمی پژوهشی مرتع، 9(3)، 254-244.

قاسمی آریان، یاسر؛ جعفریان، وحید؛ عبدالحسینی، محسن؛ مقیمی نژاد، فیروزه؛ باغستانی، ناصر؛ فرامرزی، احمد. (1403). تحلیلی بر اثربخشی مشارکت اجتماعات محلی در مدیریت و بهره‌برداری پایدار منابع طبیعی (مطالعه موردی پروژه ترسیب کربن استان گلستان – حوزه آبخیز اوغان). ترویج و توسعه آبخیزداری، 12(47)، 31-21.

قربانی، مهدی؛ آذرنیوند، حسین؛ مهرابی، علی اکبر؛  باستانی، سوسن؛ جعفری، محمد؛ نایبی، هوشنگ. (1391). تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی: رویکردی نوین در سیاست‏گذاری و برنامه‏ریزی مدیریت مشارکتی منابع طبیعی. نشریه علمی - پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری، 65(4)، 568-553.

قربانی، مهدی؛ سالاری، فاطمه؛ ملکیان، آرش؛ فهمی، هدایت. (1394). تحلیل شبکه ذی‌نفعان محلی و سرمایه اجتماعی در راستای مدیریت مشارکتی منابع آب (مطالعه موردی: حوزه آبخیز رزین، شهرستان کرمانشاه). مجله علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری ایران، 9(29)، 47-35.

قربانی، مهدی؛ عوض‌پور، لیلا؛ سیرمی‌راد، مرضیه. (1397). تحلیل و ارزیابی سرمایۀ اجتماعی درون‌گروهی در راستای توسعۀ پایدار روستایی (منطقۀ مورد مطالعه: استان کرمان، شهرستان ریگان). مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران, 7(1)، 23-1.

متشفع، بهزاد؛ جوانمرد، محمد؛ هاشم گلوگردی، ساره. (1403). تحلیل شبکة اجتماعی کنشگران محلی در مدیریت مشارکتی منابع آب و خاک در روستاهای قلعه سید ‌مقیم و خائیز بهبهان. پژوهش های آبخیزداری، 37(3)، 111-127.

Arizkha, Y. F., Prayitno, G., Dinanti, D., Biloshkurskyi, M., Hiddlestone-Mumford, J., Illingworth, J., Pant, S. C., Atkinson, C., & Li, S. (2023). The effect of social capital relations and community participation in the development of the Bejijong tourism village, Indonesia. Regional Research and Science, 1(1), 1-18.
Basati, H., Poursaeid, A., Allahyari, M.S., Eshraghi Samani, R., & Chaharsoqi Amin, H. (2020). Social Network Analysis of Local Water User Associations’ Actors: Evidence from Iran. Meteorology Hydrology and Water Management, 8(1), 73-81.
Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Tilburg, A., & Gerhard, G. (2010). How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's hand loom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 245-260.
Bodin, Ö., and Prell, C. (Eds.). (2011). Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press.
Bodin, Ö., Crona, B., & Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management – What’s there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society, 11(2), r2.
Bryson, J.M., Quick, K.S., Slotterback, C.S., Crosby, B.C., )2013(. Designing public participation processes. Public Admin. Rev. 73 (1), 23–34.
Chekkai, N., Chikhi, S., & Kheddouci, H. (2014). Weighted graph-based methods for identifying the most influential actors in trust social networks. International journal of networking and virtual organisations, 13(2), 101-128.
Cho, S., Allred, S., & Stedman, R. C. (2023). The social fabric of watershed management: comparison of citizen-based and agency-based organizations. Water, 16(1), 111.
Cundill, G., Thondhlana, G., Sisitka, L., Shackleton, S., Blore, M., )2013(. Land claims and the pursuit of co-management on four protected areas in South Africa. Land Use Policy 35, 171–178.
De Haan, A. (2001). Social exclusion: Enriching the understanding of deprivation. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 2(2), 22-40.
Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2021). Social networks analysis of rural stakeholders in watershed management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 17535-17557.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.
Ghorbani, M., Yazdanparast, M., Naderi, A., & Avazpour, L. (2025). Investigating social capital as a precondition in landscape Co-Management: Application of social network in southeastern Iran. Journal for Nature Conservation, 83, 126888.
Glaser, M. & Schroter, B. (2021). Generating knowledge on networks in environmental governance. Human Ecology Review, 27(1), 1-15.
Grewal, E., Godley, J., Wheeler, J., & Tang, K. L. (2024). Use of social network analysis in health research: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 14(1), e078872.
Grilli, N. D. M., Andrade, M. M. D., Xavier, L. Y., Santos, C. R., Stori, F. T., Carrilho, C. D., ... & Turra, A. (2021). Step by step: a participatory action-research framework to improve social participation in coastal systems. Ambiente & Sociedade, 24, e02551.
Hamzah, A., Anggoro, T., & Puryono, S. (2020). Konsep co-management dalam pendekatan pengelolaan lingkungan mangrove di desa lubuk kertang, brandan barat, sumatera utara. None.
Hamzah, P., Anggoro, S., Puryono, S., & Kurniati, E. (2021). Co-management in mangrove rehabilitation at langkat regency. E3S Web of Conferences, 202, 02001.
Hanneman, R. A., )2001(. Introduction to Social Network Methods. California: University of California, Riverside.
Hanneman, R.A. and Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods, University of California Riverside, California.
Heirany, A., Kolahi, M., & Omranian Khorasani, H. (2024). Social network analysis of rangeland stakeholders in Robat village, Khorasan Razavi Province. Integrated Watershed Management, 4(2), 66-80. (In Persian)
HosseinYazdi, M., Avazpour, L., Ghorbani, M., Ghafari, S., & Rahimi, M. (2025). Organizational Network Transformation for Rural Sustainability: Social Network Analysis of Iran’s Rural Development Program. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-18.‏
Hu, G., Wang, J., Laila, U., Fahad, S., & Li, J. (2022). Evaluating households’ community participation: Does community trust play any role in sustainable development?. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 951262.
Inam, A., Adamowski, J., Halbe, J., Prasher, S., )2015(. Using causal loop diagrams for the initialization of stakeholder engagement in soil salinity management in agricultural watersheds in developing countries: a case study in the Rechna Doab watershed, Pakistan. J. Environ. Manag. 152, 251–267.
Johnson, E. M., & Chew, R. (2021). Social network analysis methods for international development. RTI Press.
Klenk, N. L., Hickey, G. M., MacLellan, J. I., Gonzales, R., & Cardille, J. (2009). Social network analysis: A useful tool for visualizing and evaluating forestry research. International Forestry Review, 11(1), 134–140.
Koontz, T.M., Jens, N., )2014(. From planning to implementation: top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Stud. J. 4 (3), 416–442.
Leahy, E., & Anderson, H. (2008). Trust factors in community–water resources management agency relationships. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 87, 100–107.
Lema, M. W. (2025). Sustaining Rural Livelihoods Through Participatory Water Governance: A Review of Community‐Driven Water Resource Management Models in East and Central Africa. Environmental Quality Management, 34(3), e70023.
Leys, A.J., Vanclay, J.K., )2011(. Social learning: a knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes. Land Use Policy. 28 (3), 574–584.
Lim, T., Glynn, P., Shenk, G., Bitterman, P., Guillaume, J., Little, J. C., & Webster, D. (2023). Recognizing political influences in participatory social-ecological systems modeling. Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling, 5(1), 18509.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press
Maya Jariego, I. (2024). Using stakeholder network analysis to enhance the impact of participation in water governance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-6.‏
Moorman, M. C., Peterson, N., Moore, S. E., & Donoso, P. J. (2013). Stakeholder perspectives on prospects for co-management of an old-growth forest watershed near valdivia, chile. Society and Natural Resources, 26(2), 175-190.
Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269-297.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Panagopoulos, E., & Kamarianos, I. (2024). Everything is connected: an approach to qualitative network research. sociological remarks on perspectives, complexities, and difficulties. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies.
Pandey, N.K., Singh, S.K., )2016(. Participation pattern of rural people in watershed development program in Haryana State. Indian Res. J. Exten. Educ. 14 (3), 39–42.
Shisanya, C.A., )2017(. Natural resource management. Rural Development Planning in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 17–51.
Springer, A. & Steiguer, D. (2011). Social network analysis: a tool to improve understanding of collaborative management groups. Journal of Extension, 49(2), 1-8.
Thomas, A., )2017(. A context-based procedure for assessing participatory schemes in environmental planning. Ecol. Econ. 132, 113–123.
Jansouz, P., Shahraki, J., & Abdolhosseini, M. (2017). Is water trading policy an effective solution for water allocation in Voshmgir dam? Water Policy, 19(6), 1119–1142.
Üçler, N., Engin, G.O., Köçken, H.G., Öncel, M.S., )2015(. Game theory and fuzzy programming approaches for bi-objective optimization of reservoir watershed management: a case study in Namazgah reservoir. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 (9), 6546–6558.
Yavuz, F. & Baycan, T. (2014). Application of combined analytic hierarchy process (ahp) and swot for integrated watershed management. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6(1), 94-111.
Zheng, X., Sun, C., & Liu, J. (2024). Exploring stakeholder engagement in urban village renovation projects through a mixed-method approach to social network analysis: a case study of Tianjin. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-15.

  • Receive Date 14 November 2025
  • Revise Date 29 December 2025
  • Accept Date 25 May 2026
  • Publish Date 22 May 2026